DPDP Act and your visitor register: what Indian offices must do by 13 May 2027

What the DPDP Act and the Rules 2025 ask of your front desk, in plain words, with the advice we give our own clients.

Written by the founder, Arcan LabsLast reviewed 15 min read

Who this guide is for

Facilities and admin heads who run the front desk, heads of security who run the gate, and DPOs, legal and compliance teams who answer for visitor data in an audit. It covers offices, tech parks, factories, campuses and multi-tenant buildings in India, whether you use a logbook, a spreadsheet or a visitor management system.

Arcan Labs is a team of GRC consultants and physical security experts. We assess how companies and their vendors handle personal data, and we make Orb, our visitor management system. This guide is our reading of the law and the advice we give clients. It is not legal advice: take your counsel's view before you change a policy.

Does the DPDP Act cover your visitor register?

The Act applies to personal data collected in digital form, or collected otherwise and digitised later (section 3). Personal data is any data about an identifiable person (section 2(t)), so a visitor's name, mobile, company, photo, ID details and vehicle number all qualify. At your entrance:

  • A visitor app, tablet, QR check-in or kiosk: covered.
  • A spreadsheet the desk types names into: covered.
  • A logbook the guard photographs and sends on WhatsApp at the end of the shift: covered from the moment it is photographed. This is the most common case we see, and most teams do not realise it.
  • A logbook never scanned, photographed or typed up: outside the Act. This is rare, and it fails every other test a security audit applies.
Our view

Assume you are in scope. If anyone has ever photographed a register page, exported a visitor list or shared one in a group chat, you already process digital personal data.

The dates that matter

DateWhat happens
13 November 2025DPDP Rules 2025 notified. The Data Protection Board provisions apply from this day.
13 November 2026The rule on consent managers applies.
13 May 2027Most duties apply: notice, security safeguards, breach intimation, retention and erasure, children, visitor rights.

Rule 1(4) sets the main date at eighteen months after publication, which gives 13 May 2027. Some firms, including Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, count from the next day and give 14 May 2027 (and 14 November 2026 for consent managers). A proposal to shorten the timeline to twelve months was floated in January 2026, possibly only for significant data fiduciaries. As of 12 October 2026 no change had been notified; S.S. Rana & Co., writing that day on the Removal of Difficulties Order of 5 October 2026 (wording fixes to sections 9 and 10), still gives May 2027.

Until then, section 43A of the IT Act and the 2011 SPDI Rules still govern sensitive personal data. Section 44(2) of the DPDP Act repeals section 43A from the eighteen-month date.

Our view

Start now and aim to have the notice, consent flow and access log live by early 2027, which leaves room if the date is brought forward. Changing a front-desk process touches guards, reception, tenants, vendors and contracts, and in our experience that takes several months.

What the notice at your entrance must say

Before you collect anything, the visitor must see a notice (section 5, Rule 3). It must be:

  • understandable on its own, without anything else you have published;
  • in clear and plain language, itemising the data you collect and the purpose of each item;
  • clear on how to withdraw consent, exercise their rights and complain to the Data Protection Board, with a link to your website or app;
  • available, at the visitor's option, in English or any of the 22 languages in the Eighth Schedule to the Constitution (section 5(3)). Whether you must have all 22 ready in advance is unsettled.

A QR code at the door can carry the notice, as long as the visitor sees it before the first question.

Our view

Two things fail in practice: a laminated notice at the desk that nobody reads before signing, and a by checking in you agree line at the bottom of a form. Put the itemised notice first, in English, Hindi and your city's main language, with any other Eighth Schedule language on request, and record which version each visitor saw. Without that record you will struggle to show the Board that you gave notice.

Keeping visitor data safe

Section 8(5) requires reasonable security safeguards. Rule 6 sets the minimum:

  1. encryption, masking or tokens for the data;
  2. access control, including over your vendor's systems;
  3. logs of who accessed the data, with monitoring and review;
  4. backups and continuity;
  5. logs and personal data kept for one year, unless another law says otherwise;
  6. security terms in your contract with any processor;
  7. appropriate technical and organisational measures.

What a weak lobby looks like:

An open register on the desk

Every visitor can read the names and numbers above their own. The Act may not reach a page never digitised, but an auditor will record it as a privacy failure.

A shared reception tablet

With no login, you cannot say who looked at what.

Register photos on guard phones

Copies in a personal WhatsApp account are uncontrolled, and you cannot erase them.

Visitor lists emailed to tenants

A list sent every morning multiplies the data with no access log.

Our view

Auditors ask first for the access log: who opened which visitor record, and when. If your setup cannot produce it, fix that before anything else.

When something goes wrong: breach notice

A personal data breach includes accidental disclosure (section 2(u)), and there is no harm threshold. If it happens you must tell the Data Protection Board and every affected person (section 8(6), Rule 7):

WhoWhenWhat
Each affected visitorWithout delayWhat happened, likely consequences, your response, what they can do, and a contact
Data Protection BoardWithout delayA first description of the breach and its likely impact
Data Protection BoardWithin 72 hours of becoming aware, or longer if the Board agrees to a written requestFull facts, causes, mitigation, remedial steps, and a report on the notices sent
CERT-In (Directions of 28 April 2022)Within 6 hoursReportable cyber incidents, including data breaches and leaks; the Directions also require ICT logs kept for 180 days in India

Lobby scenarios that can count:

  • a guard's phone with register photos is lost;
  • a reception tablet with the day's check-ins is stolen;
  • a visitor list goes to the wrong WhatsApp group;
  • a vendor reports an incident in its cloud.
Our view

Write a one-page runbook now: who decides it is a breach, who drafts the notices, who files with the Board, and where visitor contact details are kept so you can reach the people affected. Test it once with your security team.

How long to keep visitor records

What the law says:

  • Erase when the purpose is served or consent is withdrawn, whichever is earlier, and make your vendor erase too, unless another law requires you to keep the data (section 8(7)).
  • But keep personal data, associated traffic data and processing logs for at least one year from the date of processing, for the purposes as specified in the Seventh Schedule (Rule 8(3)). These are State purposes (national security, functions under other laws, and assessing significant data fiduciaries). Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas and Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan read the rule as binding every data fiduciary, large platform or not. Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan add that it does not cover secondary uses, so it is no licence to reuse the data.
  • The 48-hour we are about to erase your data notice does not apply to you. It covers only the large e-commerce, social media and gaming platforms in the Third Schedule, which several articles miss.

Section 8(7) gives way to retention another law requires, so Rule 8(3) governs the first year. Nobody has yet tested how far it reaches into details such as photos. Vendor articles that say delete visitor photos within 24 hours rarely mention the one-year rule. Shorter is safer for the visitor, and it is a choice to make knowingly.

Our view

Split the record from the riskiest details. Keep the visit record and its logs (who came, who approved, entry and exit times, the notice and the consent) for one year, as Rule 8(3) asks, then erase them on schedule and keep proof. Keep the details that hurt most if they leak, such as photos and mobile numbers, for days. Rule 8(3) speaks of personal data generally, so make that shorter period a written decision your DPO and counsel sign off, and insist on retention you can set for each detail. In Orb, photos and mobile numbers are erased after seven days by default, and every retention clock can be changed for each detail.

Visitors under 18

A child is anyone under 18 (section 2(f)). Processing a child's data needs verifiable consent from the parent or lawful guardian (section 9(1), Rule 10), and you may not track or monitor children's behaviour (section 9(3)).

Our view

Route under-18 visitors to the desk and take consent from the parent or lawful guardian. A teacher, driver or other accompanying adult cannot give it unless they are that parent or guardian, so for school groups ask the school to collect parents' consent before the visit. Rule 10 asks you to check that the person consenting is an identifiable adult; record who they are and how you checked. Collect the minimum and do not ask children for ID. Schools, crèches and the transport providers they engage have narrow Fourth Schedule exemptions (Rule 12), so a campus should confirm its position with counsel.

Requests from visitors

Visitors can ask to see, correct or erase their data, and raise a grievance (sections 11 to 14). Publish how, and answer a grievance within a reasonable period of no more than 90 days (Rule 14). Also publish the contact details of a person who can answer questions about their data (Rule 9). If a visitor asks for erasure inside the first year, section 12(3) lets you keep what a law requires; erase everything else, and tell the visitor what you kept and until when.

Our view

Put that contact on the notice itself. A visitor standing in your lobby will not go looking for your privacy page.

If you already use a visitor management system

You are still responsible. The Act makes the data fiduciary liable irrespective of any agreement to the contrary, including for its processor (section 8(1)), and you may use a processor only under a valid contract (section 8(2)). Your vendor's compliance badge does not transfer that duty. This is the plan we run with clients in the first 30 days.

  1. Map what your system actually collects

    Open the check-in flow as a visitor and list every field, from name and mobile to photo, ID details, vehicle number and signature. Mark which are needed to let someone in; everything else is a candidate to switch off.

  2. Check the record-keeping configuration

    Check retention for each data item, whether photos and ID images are kept, who can export visitor lists, whether access is logged, and whether guards' devices store data locally.

  3. Ask your vendor these questions in writing

    1. What personal data do you collect, and for which purpose is each item used?
    2. Where is it stored, and in which country and cloud region?
    3. Which subprocessors handle it (messaging, SMS, ID checks, hosting)?
    4. Is it encrypted in transit and at rest, and who holds the keys?
    5. Is every access to a visitor record logged, including your own support staff?
    6. Can we set retention for each data item, and can you prove erasure?
    7. How fast will you tell us about a breach, in hours?
    8. Will you sign our data processing agreement, including breach timelines and audit rights?
    9. What independent evidence can you share, such as audit reports, penetration test summaries and certification scopes?
    10. When we leave, how do we get our data out, and when is it erased?
  4. Sign a data processing agreement

    Cover the Rule 6(1)(f) security terms, erasure on your instruction and at exit, stopping processing on withdrawal of consent, breach notice within fixed hours, subprocessor changes and your right to audit.

  5. Run a vendor risk assessment

    Rate the inherent risk first (photos, ID data and storage outside your control push it up), then score the vendor's answers, record the residual risk and decide to accept, accept with conditions, or replace. Repeat it yearly and whenever the vendor changes how it processes your data.

  6. Fix the front of house

    Update the notice and consent flow, train reception and guards on the desk route, and give the security supervisor the breach runbook.

Our view

In our assessment work the gap is rarely the software; nobody asked the vendor these questions or wrote down the answers. The first five steps put you ahead of most organisations, whatever system you keep.

If you still run a manual register

The fastest improvement is to remove the open register:

  1. stop photographing register pages and sharing them in chats;
  2. move check-in to a system that shows each visitor only their own entry;
  3. put a notice and consent step before the first question;
  4. keep the visit record for one year and photos and mobile numbers for days, with erasure on schedule;
  5. make sure every access to the records is logged.

Multi-tenant buildings: who is responsible?

The Act does not mention landlords or tenants. The data fiduciary is whoever decides why and how data is processed, alone or with others (section 2(i)), so a building and a tenant can both be fiduciaries for one visit.

  • The building runs one lobby for every tenant: whoever decides how that lobby works, usually the owner or its management company, is likely the fiduciary. A facility management firm that only follows the owner's instructions is more likely a processor, like the visitor management vendor.
  • A tenant pre-registers its own guests and sees their records: the tenant and the building likely decide together, which can make them joint fiduciaries for those guests; write down who does what.
  • Each tenant runs its own reception inside the building: each tenant is the fiduciary for its own register.
Our view

Write the split into the service agreement or lease annexure: who gives the notice, who answers visitor requests, who files a breach, and who contracts with the vendor. Ambiguity here turns a small incident into a landlord and tenant dispute.

Where Orb fits

We built Orb for the gaps above. It fits best when:

A corporate office or tech park

Visitors check in on their own phone, with a notice in their language and itemised consent before the first question.

A multi-tenant building

Every tenant's host approves visitors in one tap in WhatsApp, and the guard sees a live register of who is inside.

A factory or campus with contractors

ID verification, inductions signed before arrival and a live headcount at evacuation.

A DPO or auditor who wants proof

One record per visit, from notice to erasure, every look at it logged, and retention you set for each detail.

A start without new hardware

A QR poster at the door is enough, and Orb works with the turnstiles and readers you already have.

Penalties

The Schedule to the Act sets the maximum penalty for each type of breach. The Board decides the amount in each case, weighing the nature, gravity and duration of the breach, the data affected, any repetition, any gain made and any steps taken to limit the harm (section 33(2)).

Not taking reasonable security safeguardsSection 8(5)

₹250 crore

Not notifying a breach to the Board and affected peopleSection 8(6)

₹200 crore

Breaching the duties on children's dataSection 9

₹200 crore

Breaching the extra duties of a significant data fiduciarySection 10

₹150 crore

Breaching any other provision of the Act or RulesThe Schedule to the Act

₹50 crore

Your lobby checklist before 13 May 2027

Questions buyers ask

Is a manual visitor register illegal under the DPDP Act?

No. A handwritten logbook never photographed, scanned or typed up is outside the Act; a spreadsheet, or a logbook page that is photographed or typed up, is covered. An open logbook still shows every visitor the details of the people above them.

Can we refuse entry if a visitor does not consent?

In our reading, yes, for the details you genuinely need to let someone in, because consent can be limited to data necessary for the purpose (section 6(1)). Entry cannot depend on anything beyond that, such as marketing or optional fields. Offer a desk route with the same notice, and confirm the approach with counsel.

How long can we keep visitor data?

Rule 8(3) requires at least one year for personal data, traffic data and processing logs, for the State purposes in the Seventh Schedule, then erasure unless another law requires more. We advise one year for the visit record and logs, and days for photos and mobile numbers, as a written decision your DPO and counsel sign off.

Does the 48-hour pre-erasure notice apply to visitor logs?

No. Rule 8(1) and 8(2) apply only to the large e-commerce, social media and gaming platforms listed in the Third Schedule.

Who notifies a breach in a multi-tenant building?

The data fiduciary, usually whoever decides how the lobby works, often the owner or its management company; where a tenant decides with the building, both may be fiduciaries. Agree it in writing before an incident, not during one.

If our visitor management vendor has a breach, are we liable?

In most cases, yes. Section 8(1) keeps the data fiduciary responsible for processing done on its behalf, whatever the contract says. Your contract should still oblige the vendor to tell you fast and help you notify.

Sources

  1. Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, Ministry of Electronics and IT
  2. Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025, G.S.R. 846(E), 13 November 2025
  3. Corrigenda to the Rules, G.S.R. 892(E), 10 December 2025
  4. Press Information Bureau, 14 November 2025
  5. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, DPDP FAQs, law as on 7 December 2025
  6. Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan, DPDP Rules 2025, updated 16 July 2026
  7. DSCI, FAQ on data retention and erasure
  8. S.S. Rana & Co., the proposed shorter timeline, 13 February 2026
  9. Business Standard, MeitY may cut compliance timeline to 12 months, 22 January 2026
  10. S.S. Rana & Co., DPDP Removal of Difficulties Order 2026, 12 October 2026
  11. Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas, enforcement of the DPDP Act and Rules, 21 November 2025
  12. King Stubb & Kasiva, the SPDI Rules after DPDP enforcement, updated 10 September 2026
  13. JSA, DPDP Act: legal basis and notice, Edition II, August 2024
  14. DPDP Rules 2025, Rule 10 full text and Fourth Schedule, dpdpa.com
  15. PSA Legal, contract labour and section 7(i), 20 August 2026
  16. CERT-In Directions, 28 April 2022

This guide reflects the law and published guidance as of 13 October 2026. It is general information, not legal advice.

Read next

See every step of this guide in your own lobby.

Orb is the visitor management system we built for these gaps. We will walk your facilities, security and DPO teams through it on your own site.