Who this guide is for
In-house counsel, company secretaries and DPOs who own the NDA text, security and facilities heads who run the lobby, and HR and procurement teams who send candidates and contractors to reception at Indian offices, labs and plants.
Is a visitor NDA enforceable in India?
Section 2(h) of the Indian Contract Act 1872 says “An agreement enforceable by law is a contract”, and section 10 makes an agreement a contract if it is “made by the free consent of parties competent to contract”, for a lawful consideration and object. A reception NDA usually meets this:
- Competent party: an adult of sound mind (section 11); minors are covered below.
- Free consent: the visitor knows what they agree to, so show plain-language text before the visit where you can.
- Consideration: in our reading, permission to enter and the information shared.
- Lawful object: protecting non-public information.
What you can and cannot enforce:
- Confidentiality: enforceable. A promise not to disclose or misuse what the visitor saw.
- Non-compete: void. Section 27 voids “every agreement by which any one is restrained from exercising a lawful profession, trade or business of any kind”, with one exception for the sale of goodwill. In Varun Tyagi v Daffodil Software (2025:DHC:5015), an employment case, the Delhi High Court held a post-employment bar on working elsewhere void, and said such covenants can be enforced only to protect confidential and proprietary information or to prevent solicitation (JSA).
If the visitor breaks it, section 73 gives compensation for loss caused by the breach. If you name a sum, section 74 treats it as a ceiling: the court awards reasonable compensation not exceeding that amount. Courts can also restrain a breach by injunction (Specific Relief Act 1963, sections 38 and 42). A claim for compensation must be brought within three years of the breach (Limitation Act 1963, Article 55).
A visitor NDA does two jobs: it tells the visitor plainly what is off limits, and it gives you a contract to stop a leak quickly. Keep it to one screen of confidentiality terms. Every extra restriction is a clause a court may strike out.
Click-through, drawn or e-signed: which signature does a visitor NDA need?
The Contract Act does not require an NDA to be signed at all. Section 10A of the IT Act says that where proposals and acceptances are expressed electronically, “such contract shall not be deemed to be unenforceable solely on the ground that such electronic form or means was used”. In Trimex International v Vedanta Aluminium (22 January 2010), the Supreme Court held that a concluded contract could be inferred from an exchange of emails although no formal agreement was signed (S.S. Rana & Co.).
The phrase “electronic signature” is narrower. Section 2(1)(ta) defines it as authentication by a technique “specified in the Second Schedule”, including a digital signature, and section 3A sets reliability tests: the signing data is linked to the signatory and no one else, under their control when signing, and any later change to the signature or the document is detectable. Section 5 makes such a signature, affixed in the prescribed manner, satisfy any law that requires a signature.
So an “I agree” tick, a typed name or a finger-drawn signature can form a valid contract, but none of them is, by itself, an electronic signature as the Act defines it. Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan note that click-wrap agreements “are not given equal status with electronic signatures under the IT Act”, and King Stubb & Kasiva note that unconscionable terms in mass-market click-wrap contracts risk being unenforceable. The IT Act’s First Schedule excludes negotiable instruments other than cheques, powers of attorney, trusts, wills and immovable property sales; NDAs are not on it.
| Method | Legal footing | What you must prove later | Good for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unticked box and “I agree” button | Contract formation, s.10A | That this visitor clicked this text | Day visitors, candidates |
| Typed name or drawn signature | Same as above; shows intent more clearly | Same as above | Visitors who expect to “sign” |
| Electronic signature listed in the Second Schedule | s.3A and s.5; presumptions in the BSA | Less: presumptions apply | Contractor firms, long-term vendors |
Use click-through acceptance, with a strong record, for day visitors. Use an electronic signature method listed in the IT Act’s Second Schedule for the master NDA with a contractor firm and for individuals who will work in sensitive areas for weeks.
How do you prove a visitor agreed? Evidence under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam
The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 (BSA) replaced the Indian Evidence Act. Section 63 treats computer output as a document if the device was used regularly and working properly, and section 63(4) requires a certificate, in the form set out in the Schedule, each time the record is tendered. Part A is completed by the party producing the record and Part B by an expert, and both give the record’s hash value. On 22 May 2026 a three-judge bench of the Supreme Court rejected a challenge to section 63(4) and the Schedule in Pune Bar Association v Union of India, saying a hash value “is synonymous with an electronic fingerprint”; it kept open the scope of expert certification under Part B (SCC Times; JSA).
Presumptions need an electronic signature under the IT Act. Section 85 presumes an electronic agreement bearing the parties’ electronic signatures was concluded by affixing them; section 86 presumes a secure electronic record is unaltered and a secure electronic signature was affixed with intent to sign. Without a secure electronic signature, section 66 requires you to prove the signature is the visitor’s. A click-through carries no electronic signature, so you prove assent like any other fact, from your audit trail.
A record that stands up should capture:
- Which text: the exact NDA version, with its hash.
- Who: name, organisation, host, and a mobile number confirmed by a one-time code.
- What they did: the unticked box they ticked and the button wording.
- When and where: a server timestamp in IST, the site, and the device or browser.
- A copy: sent to the visitor’s phone or email at once.
- Integrity: stored so it cannot be edited, with every view logged.
- Who signs the certificate: a named role who can complete Part A, and a vendor contract that obliges your provider to export the record and its hash.
Most disputes never reach court. When a visitor asks “what did I sign?”, producing the text, the time and the copy sent to their phone usually ends the argument.
Stamp duty on a visitor NDA: does it apply, and how much?
Stamp duty is set by each state. Maharashtra’s definition of “instrument” covers electronic records (section 2(l)), so an e-signed or click-through NDA can be chargeable.
- Rate. Article 5(h)(B) of Schedule I charges agreements “if not otherwise provided for”. An ordinance of 14 October 2024 raised it from ₹100 to ₹500, the rate Khaitan & Co. gives in July 2026. In John Cockerill India v Sanjay Kamalakar Navare (2023), the Bombay High Court placed an employee non-disclosure agreement under 5(h)(B) (SCC Times).
- A trap. Article 5(h)(A)(iv) charges duty as a percentage of value on agreements that create an obligation, right or interest with a monetary value. If your NDA names a large liquidated-damages figure, ask counsel whether that gives it a monetary value.
- Unstamped is not void. On 13 December 2023 a seven-judge bench of the Supreme Court (In re Interplay between Arbitration Agreements and the Indian Stamp Act, overruling N.N. Global) held that unstamped agreements are inadmissible in evidence but “not rendered void or void ab initio or unenforceable”, and that the defect is curable. Under section 34 of the Maharashtra Act, an unstamped instrument can be admitted on paying the shortfall plus a penalty of 2% of it for every month or part of a month, capped at four times the shortfall.
- Other states. Rates, articles and penalties differ, so check the Act of the state where the NDA is signed.
Stamping hundreds of day-visitor acceptances at ₹500 each is costly, and leaving chargeable instruments unstamped on purpose is risky: section 59 of the Maharashtra Act punishes executing an unstamped instrument with intent to evade duty. Ask counsel whether your day-visitor acceptance is a chargeable instrument and how to pay if it is, and record the advice. Stamp the master NDA with each contractor firm before work starts.
Who should sign a visitor NDA, and who should not?
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A 6.6, “Confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements”, asks organisations to identify where confidentiality agreements are needed, document them and review them regularly (TCSA). Applied to a lobby:
| Visitor type | NDA? | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Client and partner guests | Usually no | Show site rules; add an NDA only for roadmap or lab visits |
| Interview candidates | Sometimes | Only if they see live work, labs or take-home tasks |
| Vendors and contractors | Yes | Firm-level NDA plus an individual acknowledgement |
| Auditors and consultants | Rarely | Rely on the confidentiality terms in their engagement letter |
| Inspectors and police acting under a law | No | Do not make entry depend on signing |
| Couriers and delivery staff | No | Keep them at reception |
| Children | Never | See the next section |
Asking everyone to sign trains people to click without reading. Reserve the NDA for visitors who will see non-public information; give everyone else a short site rules notice.
Minors at reception: a child cannot sign a visitor NDA
Section 11 of the Contract Act makes competence depend on the age of majority, and in Mohori Bibee v Dharmodas Ghose (1903) the Privy Council held an agreement with a minor void from the start. A 16-year-old intern cannot be bound by your NDA, however it is signed.
Separately, the DPDP Act treats anyone under 18 as a child (section 2(f)). Section 9(1) requires verifiable consent of the parent or lawful guardian before processing a child’s personal data, and Rule 10 requires due diligence that the person giving it is an identifiable adult.
- Keep children out of confidential areas and escort them throughout.
- Ask the parent or guardian to sign a short undertaking. It binds the adult only.
- Get consent for the child’s check-in data from a parent or lawful guardian, after the Rule 10 check.
Solve minors with escorts and access limits. If a school group tours your plant, plan a route that shows nothing confidential.
Contractors: one NDA with the firm, one acknowledgement at the gate
Scenario: 7:30 am, a data centre in Hyderabad. Fourteen AMC technicians arrive for a chiller overhaul. Their employer signed a master NDA last month; each technician accepted a short acknowledgement and the induction on their phone the evening before.
- Firm level. The firm signs the master NDA with a Second Schedule electronic signature, promises its workers are bound by equivalent terms, and is liable for their breaches. Stamp it.
- Worker level. Each worker accepts a short acknowledgement before first entry, linked to the induction record and the pass.
- No restraints. Do not ask workers to promise not to work for your competitors (section 27).
See also contractor management under the OSH Code and visitor management for factories.
The firm’s NDA is the one you would sue on; the worker’s acknowledgement proves each person was told. You need both.
The visitor NDA and the DPDP Act: keep them separate
The NDA flow collects personal data, so the DPDP Act applies. Most duties apply from 13 May 2027 (Rule 1(4)); some firms, including Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, give 14 May 2027. A proposal to shorten the timeline (Business Standard, January 2026) had not been notified as of 12 October 2026 (S.S. Rana & Co.).
- Notice first. Section 5(1) requires a notice before or with any request for consent, and section 5(3) gives the visitor the option of English or any Eighth Schedule language. Rule 3(a) requires the notice to be “understandable independently of any other information”, so do not bury it in the NDA.
- No bundled consent. Section 6(1) requires consent that is “free, specific, informed, unconditional and unambiguous”, and section 6(2) makes any part that infringes the Act invalid. A clause in which the visitor “consents to all processing” is unlikely to count as valid consent.
- Separate retention clocks. Rule 8(3) requires personal data, traffic data and processing logs to be kept for at least one year for the purposes in the Seventh Schedule; Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas and Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan read it as binding every data fiduciary. The signed NDA has a different purpose: you may need it until claims are time-barred.
| Record | Keep for | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Visitor photo and mobile number | Days, as a signed decision | Not needed to prove the NDA; highest exposure if leaked |
| Visit record and its logs | 1 year | DPDP Rule 8(3) |
| Signed NDA and its audit trail | Confidentiality term plus 3 years | Limitation Act, Article 55 |
Ask counsel to confirm the basis for keeping the signed NDA beyond the visit and say so in the notice. See our guide to the DPDP Act and your visitor register.
Visitor NDA template (India)
A one-way confidentiality undertaking for a reception or pre-arrival flow. Its structure is adapted from General Legal’s public domain (CC0) one-way NDA and rewritten for Indian law. Replace placeholders in [brackets] and have counsel review it before use.
- Who this is between. [Company name], [registered address] (“we”), and the visitor named below (“you”), visiting on behalf of [visitor’s organisation, or “yourself”].
- Purpose. You are visiting [site] on [date] to [purpose of visit]. This undertaking also covers follow-up visits for the same purpose within [30] days.
- Confidential information. Anything not public that you see, hear or receive during the visit: products, designs, screens, whiteboards, documents, conversations, secure areas, security arrangements and personal data of our staff and customers.
- What you agree to do. Use confidential information only for the purpose; not disclose it to anyone outside your organisation who does not need it for the purpose; take no photographs, video or recordings without your host’s written permission; make no copies; not enter it into any public or third-party AI tool; and tell your host at once if you think it has been disclosed.
- What is not confidential. Information that is or becomes public through no fault of yours, that you already had without a duty of confidence, that you receive lawfully from someone else, or that you develop independently.
- Disclosure required by law. You may disclose what a law, court or regulator requires; where lawful, tell us first and disclose only what is required. Nothing here stops you reporting a possible offence or wrongdoing to the police, a regulator or a court.
- Returning material. Return or delete any material we gave you when the visit ends or when we ask.
- How long it lasts. [Three] years from your last visit under this undertaking, and for trade secrets as long as they remain secret.
- No other restriction. This undertaking does not stop you working for anyone or carrying on any trade or business.
- Your organisation’s NDA. If [visitor’s organisation] has signed an NDA with us, both apply; if they conflict, that agreement prevails.
- If this is breached. We may claim compensation and ask a court to restrain the breach.
- Your personal data. We handle your personal data as described in our separate visitor privacy notice. Nothing here limits your rights under the Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023.
- Law and courts. The laws of India apply, and the courts at [city] have jurisdiction.
- How you accept. You accept by ticking the box and tapping [I agree], or by signing below. We accept by admitting you. A copy is sent to your phone or email.
| Field | Entry |
|---|---|
| Visitor name and organisation | [ ] |
| Host name and site | [ ] |
| Mobile number or email for the copy | [ ] |
| How accepted (tick and [I agree], or signature) | [ ] |
| Date and time of acceptance (IST) | [ ] |
| NDA version and hash | [ ] |
| Stamp duty reference, if stamped | [ ] |
Visitor NDA rollout checklist
Where Orb fits
Orb, our visitor management system, puts the NDA in the right place in the visit.
Contractors and candidates
They sign NDAs and inductions before they arrive, so the gate checks a completed record instead of hosting a reading session.
Privacy notice first
Before any question, the visitor sees a notice in their own language, with consent item by item and nothing pre-ticked.
Retention your counsel signs off
Each detail has its own retention clock, photos and mobile numbers are erased after seven days by default, and every look at a visitor record is logged.
Questions buyers ask
Is a click-through NDA valid in India?
Yes, in principle. Section 10A of the IT Act 2000 says a contract is not unenforceable only because it was formed electronically. Keep a strong audit trail, because without an electronic signature under the IT Act you must prove the visitor agreed.
Does a visitor NDA need stamp duty?
In Maharashtra, an NDA with no money value falls under Article 5(h)(B) of the Stamp Act, now ₹500; the Bombay High Court applied that article to an employee NDA in 2023. An unstamped agreement is not void, but it cannot be used in evidence until the duty and a penalty are paid. Other states set their own rates.
Can a visitor NDA include a non-compete clause?
No. Section 27 of the Contract Act voids agreements that restrain anyone from a lawful profession, trade or business, apart from the sale of goodwill. Limit the NDA to confidentiality.
Can a minor sign a visitor NDA?
No. An agreement with a minor is void under Indian law (Mohori Bibee v Dharmodas Ghose). Use escorts and access limits, and get verifiable consent from a parent or lawful guardian under DPDP section 9 for the child’s data.
How long should we keep signed visitor NDAs?
We suggest the confidentiality term plus three years, the limitation period for suing on a breach under Article 55 of the Limitation Act. Keep photos and mobile numbers for days on a separate clock.
Sources
- The Indian Contract Act, 1872, India Code, Ministry of Law and Justice
- The Information Technology Act, 2000 (as amended), PRS Legislative Research copy
- Gazette notifications amending the Second Schedule of the IT Act, Controller of Certifying Authorities, MeitY
- E-signing of contracts and documents in India, S.S. Singhania & Partners (Mondaq), 6 August 2021
- Electronic execution of contracts in the time of pandemic, Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan, updated 28 January 2026
- Understanding Clickwrap Agreements: Best Practices, Enforcement, And International Perspectives, King Stubb & Kasiva, 22 January 2024
- Legality and enforceability of electronic arbitration agreements in India (on Trimex v Vedanta), S.S. Rana & Co.
- Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, section 63, bare act text (AdvocateKhoj)
- Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, section 66, bare act text (AdvocateKhoj)
- Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, section 85, bare act text (AdvocateKhoj)
- Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, section 86, bare act text (AdvocateKhoj)
- Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, Schedule (certificate under section 63(4)(c)), bare act text (AdvocateKhoj)
- Hash value is an electronic fingerprint; Section 63(4) BSA certificate requirement is valid, SCC Times, 8 July 2026
- JSA Prism: Dispute Resolution, June 2026 (electronic evidence), JSA Advocates and Solicitors, June 2026
- Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 (compilation amended to 3 June 2022), Inspector General of Registration, Maharashtra
- Maharashtra Stamp (Amendment) Ordinance, 2024 (Mah. Ord. XII of 2024), Government of Maharashtra, 14 October 2024 (PRS copy)
- Maharashtra Stamp (Fourth Amendment) Bill, 2026, Khaitan & Co., 17 July 2026
- Electronic contracts: applicability of stamp duty, LexCounsel (Mondaq), 8 December 2016
- JSA Prism: Dispute Resolution, December 2023 (unstamped agreements, seven-judge bench), JSA Advocates and Solicitors, December 2023
- In re Interplay between Arbitration Agreements and the Indian Stamp Act: validity of unstamped arbitration agreement, Supreme Court Observer (judgment of 13 December 2023)
- Unstamped arbitration agreement: Bombay High Court fixes deficiency of stamp duty and penalty (John Cockerill India v Sanjay Kamalakar Navare), SCC Times, 27 September 2023
- Varun Tyagi v Daffodil Software Pvt. Ltd., JSA Prism: Employment, July 2025
- Varun Tyagi v Daffodil Software Pvt. Ltd., neutral citation 2025:DHC:5015, Verdictum, 27 June 2025
- Can a minor enter into a binding contract? Mohori Bibee v Dharmodas Ghose, SCC Times, 6 June 2026
- The Specific Relief Act, 1963, Supreme Court Legal Services Committee
- Limitation Act, 1963, Schedule, Part II (Article 55), bare act text (AdvocateKhoj)
- ISO 27001 Annex A 6.6: Confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements, TCSA
- Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology
- DPDP Rules 2025, Rule 3 (notice), dpdpa.com (text reproduction)
- DPDP Rules 2025, Rule 8 (retention), dpdpa.com (text reproduction)
- DPDP Rules 2025, Rule 10 (verifiable consent for children), dpdpa.com (text reproduction)
- Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025: incremental tweaks and the way ahead, Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan, updated 16 July 2026
- DPDP FAQs (law as on 7 December 2025), Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas
- Meity may cut compliance timeline for key DPDP rules to 12 months, Business Standard, 22 January 2026
- DPDP (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2026: what has been changed for children’s data and SDF audits, S.S. Rana & Co., 12 October 2026
- One-Way Non-Disclosure Agreement template (CC0), General Legal
This guide reflects Indian law and published guidance as of 18 October 2026. It is general information, not legal advice: confirm your NDA text, stamping and retention with counsel.